White Evangelicals?

 

White Evangelicals.

If that shop-worn phrase brings harps and halos to mind, you’ve been brain-washed.

White evangelicals is a euphemism.

It’s a euphemism for theocratic fascists.

Does that seem harsh? It doesn’t sound like Aunt Bessie sewing quilts in the church basement, does it? No. It wouldn’t. It wouldn’t because quilting bees in church basements is a very benign enterprise.

Now, imagine that the quilt that Aunt Bessie and company are making features the face of the Tangerine Beast – TFG – with a banner that reads ‘Stop the Steal’ or ‘Trump Won!’ with the stars and bars as a back-ground. Still benign?

Preachers spewing anti-vax/anti-mask twaddle from their TV studio chapels. Evangelicals hopping up and down in a toddler-like rage that ‘Geezus is my vaccine!’; bloated braggarts of ‘god’ telling their congregations that MEDIA stands for ‘Most Evil Demon in America’! Say fecking what?

This ain’t Aunt Bessie taking cookies to the doddering, widowed pastor. The modern pastor may very well own a sizeable real estate portfolio or even a small fleet of private jets.

Think not?

Consider the mega-churches; temples to the grift that keeps on giving and forgiving. They represent a most substantial outlay of capital. Considerable moolah has been invested in grandiose tabernacles on expansive and luxurious tracts of land.
(Sorry if this disillusions you but that money does not fall from the sky – no matter how righteous you are.)

Investors want return on their investment. ROI. Bilking the gullible is the basic business plan. Wow ‘em with stage-craft and baffle ‘em with bullshit. That’s a proven method of getting a sustainable return on investment, quarter on quarter.

Here’s the pitch:

‘Want to be delivered from perdition? Send a check or money order in an amount that hurts.’ Go without food. Let your dog skip its visit to the vet. Let your husband skip his medication or his chemo. Cut corners anyway you can but send the ‘Good Lord’ your dough. As George Carlin brilliantly observed, "God Loves you... and he needs money."

Harsh, right? Indeed, it is. Conning gullible folks out of their savings is despicable. Promising a pie-in-the-sky happy-ever-after prance in the clouds for eternity - redeemable only after you’re dead - is simply evil.

 

 

 

 

Hair's-breadth Cracks in the Tortoise's Shell

 

Is Mitch McConnell cracking?

After years of being the Grim Reaper and Obstructionist Numero Uno, has Moscow Mitch finally been backed into a corner he can’t escape from? 

It’s only a guess at this time; a conjecture based on scant evidence, but Mitch definitely blinked in the staring contest between the GOP and the Dems. Despite the own-goal assistance of Dem bugaboos, Manchin and Sinema, Mitch has blinked and kicked the Debt Ceiling Can down the road.

In prior years, Mitch would have gone to the mattresses with oleaginous dorks like Rafael Cruz and Rand Paul to force the hand of the Democrats to cave to his chelonian will. This time, however, the Old Turtle seems to have gotten flipped onto his back.

Conjecture is that Mitch is trying to play stall-ball while the Dems steel themselves for a change in the Senate filibuster rule. It has been reported that the Dems were hammering out such a change in the filibuster and were close to making such a play work. It was also intimated that Mitch may have made his can-kicking move because the Dems were about to pull the filibuster rug out from under him.

At the same time, the proverbial rug would also be yanked from under the Bugbear Pair, Manchin and Sinema. Their faithless leverage would all but disappear.

Mitch blinked when he proposed offering a delaying tactic to put off a vote for raising the debt ceiling until December. All that it has done is gain Mitch some time. In that time, it is hoped that the Dems will amend or end the filibuster rule and take rightful control of the Senate, at long last. In that time, the Dems should be able to steel themselves, close ranks and bulldoze through Biden’s agenda.

Mitch blinked and it was quite a ‘blink’. Perhaps Mitch even nodded off briefly. Perhaps that’s hoping for too much.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Windows; January 6th

 

Video has revealed that the January 6^th attackers bee-lined to the four exceptionally weak points of the Capitol Building.

(Nota bene – After 9-11, the Capitol Building was fortified and reinforced; first the windows and glass doors were laminated with a translucent coating of Kevlar. Later, most of the same windows and doors were more solidly, structurally fortified to hold up to truck bombs and the like. However, two windows and two glass doors were not strengthened in this way because they were deemed to be ‘tucked away’ and probably not subject to the force of the blast from a truck bomb.)

As it turns out, it was to these vulnerable windows that the seditious militia members made a bee-line.  After three tries, (with fist, then pole, then stolen police shield) the rioters smashed the first window and slithered through it to wreak havoc. All of this was captured on video; much of it – the smashing of the windows   and the unlawful entry – has been seen hundreds of times on MSM.

Moreover, it has generally been known that the leaders of the assault obviously had detailed maps of the Capitol by which to plan and execute their assault.  Conjecture of complicit Congressmembers such as Lauren Boebert is rampant but as yet unverified; feasible and likely but, as yet, uncorroborated. The Select Committee has issued subpoenas in that regard.

Thus far, sentences for the Jan. 6^th insurrectionists have been perceived as pathetic slaps on the wrist. However, when the Select Committee hears testimony that these mutherfeckers were primed with the information about which windows they could smash, penalties for their treasonous behavior should drastically increase. Right now, it seems the courts and the prosecutors are accepting the tall tale that rioters were 'swept up' in the emotions of the day. 

This is utter Trumpian twaddle.

It is evident to most on the Left that the January 6th attack was planned and the Capitol Building scouted and reconnoitered beforehand.

The most important questions that the Committee must ask are; ‘Who planned the attack?’ and ‘Who facilitated the attack?’.

 

 

Stephie Dishes a Cold Dish

 

The raft of tell-all books, from accomplices to the criminality of the Former Arsehole-in-chief, keeps growing larger. As one wag put it, ‘We don’t need to read about it. We lived through it!’

Indeed, we scraped by ‘by the skin of our teeth’ considering how close the Republic came to being dismantled as Steve Bannon had intended. 

The non-functional press secretary, Stephanie Grisham, is the latest to make the promo circuit. (Grisham is, of course, best known as the White House press secretary who NEVER held a press conference during her blighted tenure. The silence, IMHO, was a welcome reprieve from the incessant lying of her predecessor.)

Stephie is hawking her gut-churning tale of folderol, tabloid gossip, and – on occasion, insight - of the inner psychosis that was the Trump White House.  

No surprise, Grisham’s tell-all is an “unrepentant confession” presumably meant to excuse her psychotic silence while she actually held office in Trump’s West Wing.

Are we actually meant to accept as fact that Stephanie Grisham has had a ‘come-to-Jesus’ moment re: the Giant Orange Blob of fascist protoplasm?

Pardon if this writer is unconvinced by her self-serving, feigned remorse.

To wit: Ms Grisham feebly beat her breast (without accepting any blame) that the Trump Administration’s response to the pandemic was ‘tragic’.

As Doctor Jonathan Reiner, professor of Medicine at The George Washington University Medical Center responded; “Tell that to the 700,000 dead Americans!”

Dr Jonathan Reiner also tweeted; ‘I have no respect for the insiders who witnessed the madness of the last president and with their silence became his enablers. Grisham’s book should be called “Complicit”’.

When asked point-blank by Brianna Keilar, during CNN’s ‘New Day’ interview, if she, Stephanie, was culpable for any of the tragic mis-steps of TFG mal-administration such as the January 6^th Insurrection, Ms Grisham demurred. 

Isn’t it odd how all of these former functionaries in the Former Guy’s White House had so little influence while they held positions of influence?

ATTN: Pearl-Clutchers

 

Okay, there seems to be a lot of pearl-clutching angst amongst some in response to Senator Kyrsten Sinema, being cornered in the wash-room by her own constituents whom she does not deign to meet in a more formal setting.

Please note that Ms Sinema is a sitting US Senator. She is not your child’s kindergarten teacher. She is not the chair of the clothing drive at your church. She is not the smiling cashier at CVS or the helpful teller at your local bank branch. She is not attending a tea social. She is not a member of your bridge club.

Kyrsten Sinema is an elected official. She was sent to the Senate after she promised to make her constituents’ lives better. Her supporters campaigned to elect her in Arizona. They gave of their own time and energy to put Ms Sinema in a position of power and influence.

However, Ms. Sinema is holding up vital legislation that will change people's lives for the better all over the USA. Sinema is obstructing that effort for no good reason at all. She is acting more like a pawn of Mitch McConnell than a member of Chuck Schumer’s team. She has thrown her campaign workers – her own constituents – under the proverbial bus. She has done this without comment or rationale.

So, get in her face and demand some answers. Confront her whenever and wherever she is. On a plane? Yes! Confront her. At dinner? Yes, Confront her. Walking down the street? Yes. Confront her. At her next Iron-man event? Yes! In the rest-room? Yes! Confront her.

Demand answers. Demand some action that shows that indicates she is a member of the Democratic Party. Demand that she respect the wishes of her own constituents.

 

 

 

Video has revealed that the January 6^th attackers bee-lined to the four exceptionally weak points of the Capitol Building.

(Nota bene – After 9-11, the Capitol Building was fortified and reinforced; first the windows and glass doors were laminated with a translucent coating of Kevlar. Later, most of the same windows and doors were more solidly, structurally fortified to hold up to truck bombs and the like. However, two windows and two glass doors were not strengthened in this way because they were deemed to be ‘tucked away’ and probably not subject to the force of the blast from a truck bomb.)

As it turns out, it was to these vulnerable windows that the seditious militia members made a bee-line.  After three tries, (with fist, then pole, then stolen police shield) the rioters smashed the first window and slithered through it to wreak havoc. All of this was captured on video; much of it – the smashing of the windows   and the unlawful entry – has been seen hundreds of times on MSM. 

Moreover, it has generally been known that the leaders of the assault obviously had detailed maps of the Capitol by which to plan and execute their assault.  Conjecture of complicit Congressmembers such as Lauren Boebert is rampant but as yet unverified; feasible and likely but, as yet, uncorroborated. The Select Committee has issued subpoenas in that regard.

Thus far, sentences for the Jan. 6^th insurrectionists have been perceived as pathetic slaps on the wrist. However, when the Select Committee hears testimony that these mutherfeckers were primed with the information about which windows they could smash, penalties for their treasonous behavior should drastically increase. Right now, it seems the courts and the prosecutors are accepting the tall tale that rioters were 'swept up' in the emotions of the day. 

This is utter Trumpian twaddle.

It is evident to most on the Left that the January 6th attack was planned and the Capitol Building scouted and reconnoitered beforehand. 

The most important questions that the Committee must ask are; ‘Who planned the attack?’ and ‘Who facilitated the attack?’.

 

 

Folie à Millions

 

 

They can’t be this stupid.

Think about it.

Anti-maskers, Anti-vaxxers, COVID-iots, etc.

They can’t all be so stupid.
Some? Sure.
All? Can't be.

What is being asked of us all is prescribed by experts from pertinent disciplines; immunology, virology, infectious disease and the like. That prescription is meant to prevent disease and death by that disease. What’s being asked of us is that we take very simple precautions; wear a mask, wash your hands, keep your distance, get your jabs. What’s being asked of us is that we preserve our own life and the lives of our own.

Refusing to comply with the recommendations of medical experts is not a just an ignorant choice. It is something more than ignorance. It is something that over-rides the inherent compunction to save one’s own life. That’s not just stupidity or a horrific failure of sound judgment. 

That’s insanity.

A Curmudgeon's Take

 

Seems the only way to approach this is as a curmudgeon. There have been two stories which have dominated international cable news; Gabby Petito’s disappearance & Britney’s legal plight. While the first is certainly tragic, how can it be that this story – this one story - is international news? The second - a ‘poor-little-rich-girl’ story - is only deserving of the National Inquirer, yet it, too, is international news.

Additionally, Facebook and Instagram are in deep doo-doo for bringing low the self-esteem of young girls. How the social-media giant(s) were able to accomplish this mean-girl feat is bogglesome, at least to this curmudgeon. 

Apparently, young girls following other young girls on Instagram are dismayed by the presentation of good times, prosperity and blooming love-lives by ‘influencers’ who are rewarded for presenting idyllic fables for their subscribers to drool over. According to reports, the on-line display of enviable lives devastates the confidence of some young women; purportedly. 

If the curmudgeonly attitude towards the real-life stories of young women seems cold and unfeeling, it’s because the incessant coverage of them makes so little sense.

First, are these troubled teens troubled by the fact that there is inequity in life? Can they be forlorn due to the Tik-Tok narratives they view? Slice-of-life narratives showing others at exotic vacation sites, dressed in cutting-edge fashions, replete with fairy-tale romances and high-ticket accoutrement apparently ushers in crushing depression amongst those viewers for which the aforementioned glimpses of life among the Rich and Famous are well-beyond reach.

Why the media attention? Do people fear that Gabby’s estranged fiancée might be a serial killer and so, warrants a multi-state manhunt? The inclusion of Dog, Bounty-hunter of reality-TV fame makes for a real media circus. Is the despotic junta in Myanmar not an issue anymore?

Do people fear that they, like Britney, will fall under the court-ordered control of a demonic conservator? Are these stories to be taken as emblematic of all women? Is ‘#FreeBritney’ on a par with ‘#BLM’?

Perhaps those poor, unfortunate Instagram followers might take solace or at least, glean cautionary tales from the tragedy of Gabby Petito and, in Britney’s case, the horror of parental conservatorship with this simple observation: “Gee, they looked so happy.”

But, that just might be the curmudgeon talking.